Gronk
SC member
Gronk SMASH!
Posts: 93
Likes: 28
|
Post by Gronk on Feb 14, 2017 8:20:18 GMT -5
Patriots in great salary cap shape heading into 2017Ordinarily, you’d expect the worst teams to have a lot of salary cap space and the best teams to have very little salary cap space because the best teams have a lot of good players to pay. Heading into 2017, there’s one exception to that: The Super Bowl champion Patriots. While nine of the 10 teams with the most cap space available in 2017 were teams that missed the playoffs, the 10th is the Patriots. Via Spotrac, the Patriots head into 2017 with $63 million in cap space, which is the sixth-most in the NFL. Only the Browns, 49ers, Buccaneers, Titans and Jaguars have more cap space than the Patriots. That’s a testament to the way Bill Belichick has run the team since taking over in 2000: Belichick is always very careful not to overpay for players, and he doesn’t hesitate to let high-priced veteran players walk and replace them with inexpensive younger players. The Patriots have to feel particularly good about where they stand compared to the rest of their division: The Dolphins have $29 million in cap space, the Bills have $27 million and the Jets are $7 million over the cap, meaning they’ll have to make some roster moves just to get under the cap before the start of the league year next month. The Patriots have a lot more room to improve their roster than the other teams in their division do. New England is on top, and well-positioned to stay on top. No one should be surprised if a year from now, the Patriots are again celebrating a title. profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2017/02/08/patriots-in-great-salary-cap-shape-heading-into-2017/
|
|
Gronk
SC member
Gronk SMASH!
Posts: 93
Likes: 28
|
Post by Gronk on Feb 14, 2017 8:21:52 GMT -5
Patriots have 15 pending free agentsAs the Patriots commence their quest for a sixth Super Bowl, they’ll likely be replacing more than six members of their 2016 final roster. Via multiple reports, the Patriots have looming 15 free agents. And by “looming” I mean “four weeks from today.” Yes, in just 28 days the offseason market opens, with the Patriots facing the potential loss of 13 unrestricted free agents and two restricted free agents. The unrestricted free agents are tight ends Martellus Bennett and Greg Scruggs, running backs LeGarrette Blount and Brandon Bolden, fullback James Develin, receiver Michael Floyd, linebackers Dont’a Hightower and Barkevious Mingo, cornerback Logan Ryan, safety Duron Harmon, and defensive linemen Alan Branch, Chris Long, and Jabaal Sheard. Cornerback Malcolm Butler and tackle Cameron Fleming are restricted free agents. The Patriots may use either one franchise tag or one transition tag to keep an unrestricted free agent in place. Hightower is believed to be the most likely to be tagged, absent a long-term deal. Regardless of how it turns out, Bill Belichick once again will prove that he’s not only the best coach in NFL history but also the best General Manager (albeit de facto) to ever put a team together — given that he consistently finds a way to manage the roster while accounting for the salary cap and dealing with the reality that other teams will try to poach players from successful teams profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2017/02/09/patriots-have-15-pending-free-agents/
|
|
|
Post by Zig on Feb 15, 2017 9:52:00 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Smuck on Feb 28, 2017 15:04:21 GMT -5
At the risk of a redseat, Pats will not tag Hightower. Expected to explore the market.
Collins just got 4/50, so I'm gonna miss Hightower.
|
|
|
Post by Just Another Shem on Feb 28, 2017 15:06:21 GMT -5
At the risk of a redseat, Pats will not tag Hightower. Expected to explore the market. Collins just got 4/50, so I'm gonna miss Hightower. Words
|
|
Chappion
VIP Member
Posts: 21,128
Likes: 2,166
|
Post by Chappion on Feb 28, 2017 15:11:05 GMT -5
At the risk of a redseat, Pats will not tag Hightower. Expected to explore the market. Collins just got 4/50, so I'm gonna miss Hightower. Big mistake there! I figured they were keeping Hightower. Especially once they unloaded Collins and Chandler Jones.
|
|
|
Post by Smuck on Feb 28, 2017 15:18:41 GMT -5
At the risk of a redseat, Pats will not tag Hightower. Expected to explore the market. Collins just got 4/50, so I'm gonna miss Hightower. Big mistake there! I figured they were keeping Hightower. Especially once they unloaded Collins and Chandler Jones. Tag number is huge, because it includes pass rushing OLBs. I'd probably tag him, but I trust BFB. I wouldn't pay him 4 @ whatever the difference between him and Jones is (4/64?). Too much.
|
|
Chappion
VIP Member
Posts: 21,128
Likes: 2,166
|
Post by Chappion on Feb 28, 2017 15:20:38 GMT -5
Big mistake there! I figured they were keeping Hightower. Especially once they unloaded Collins and Chandler Jones. Tag number is huge, because it includes pass rushing OLBs. I'd probably tag him, but I trust BFB. I wouldn't pay him 4 @ whatever the difference between him and Jones is (4/64?). Too much. Yeah, I know better than to worry about Belichick. I have 100% confidence in him. I just figured Hightower was the one they would keep around.
|
|
|
Post by Smuck on Feb 28, 2017 15:23:07 GMT -5
Tag number is huge, because it includes pass rushing OLBs. I'd probably tag him, but I trust BFB. I wouldn't pay him 4 @ whatever the difference between him and Jones is (4/64?). Too much. Yeah, I know better than to worry about Belichick. I have 100% confidence in him. I just figured Hightower was the one they would keep around. It's always about the value proposition with him. I thought McCourty was gone too, but he came back with a number that BFB matched. Hoping it goes that way with Hightower, but it probably won't. We'll see, I guess.
|
|
|
Post by Just Another Shem on Feb 28, 2017 15:23:59 GMT -5
Big mistake there! I figured they were keeping Hightower. Especially once they unloaded Collins and Chandler Jones. Tag number is huge, because it includes pass rushing OLBs. I'd probably tag him, but I trust BFB. I wouldn't pay him 4 @ whatever the difference between him and Jones is (4/64?). Too much. Understand what you're saying but at some point if you're not going to pay Hightower then who are you going to pay? He plays the position that Belichick values above all. He was homegrown in Bill's system. Any has made two huge plays in back-to-back Super Bowl victories. What more can you possibly ask of the guy? He is also one of only two players on that defense who has proven to be an elite talent. If you're not going to pay him a fair market deal then who are you ever going to pay?
|
|
|
Post by Smuck on Feb 28, 2017 15:26:35 GMT -5
Tag number is huge, because it includes pass rushing OLBs. I'd probably tag him, but I trust BFB. I wouldn't pay him 4 @ whatever the difference between him and Jones is (4/64?). Too much. Understand what you're saying but at some point if you're not going to pay Hightower then who are you going to pay? He plays the position that Belichick values above all. He was homegrown in Bill's system. Any has made two huge plays in back-to-back Super Bowl victories. What more can you possibly ask of the guy? He is also one of only two players on that defense who has proven to be an elite talent. If you're not going to pay him a fair market deal then who are you ever going to pay? This narrative is tired. BFB pays, he even overpays a little (Wilfork, Mankins, McCourty). He just won't overpay a LOT, because it fucks the construction of the roster. There's 52 other guys to pay.
|
|
Chappion
VIP Member
Posts: 21,128
Likes: 2,166
|
Post by Chappion on Feb 28, 2017 15:30:25 GMT -5
Tag number is huge, because it includes pass rushing OLBs. I'd probably tag him, but I trust BFB. I wouldn't pay him 4 @ whatever the difference between him and Jones is (4/64?). Too much. Understand what you're saying but at some point if you're not going to pay Hightower then who are you going to pay? He plays the position that Belichick values above all. He was homegrown in Bill's system. Any has made two huge plays in back-to-back Super Bowl victories. What more can you possibly ask of the guy? He is also one of only two players on that defense who has proven to be an elite talent. If you're not going to pay him a fair market deal then who are you ever going to pay? Totally agree. Hightower does seem to be injured quite a bit, but that hardly makes him unique among NFL players.
|
|
|
Post by Smuck on Feb 28, 2017 15:32:45 GMT -5
Understand what you're saying but at some point if you're not going to pay Hightower then who are you going to pay? He plays the position that Belichick values above all. He was homegrown in Bill's system. Any has made two huge plays in back-to-back Super Bowl victories. What more can you possibly ask of the guy? He is also one of only two players on that defense who has proven to be an elite talent. If you're not going to pay him a fair market deal then who are you ever going to pay? Totally agree. Hightower does seem to be injured quite a bit, but that hardly makes him unique among NFL players. The point that you guys are making that Hightower is "different" is spot-on. Without question, he is. I expect BFB to go further for him than most. There is a hard limit to that though. That's my point. 53 guys need to be paid
|
|
Chappion
VIP Member
Posts: 21,128
Likes: 2,166
|
Post by Chappion on Feb 28, 2017 15:39:26 GMT -5
Totally agree. Hightower does seem to be injured quite a bit, but that hardly makes him unique among NFL players. The point that you guys are making that Hightower is "different" is spot-on. Without question, he is. I expect BFB to go further for him than most. There is a hard limit to that though. That's my point. 53 guys need to be paid I get that. I just figured they moved on from Chandler Jones and Collins with the specific intention of paying Hightower. I hope they still do.
|
|
jets12
VIP Member
Posts: 54,917
Likes: 9,986
|
Post by jets12 on Feb 28, 2017 15:41:38 GMT -5
The point that you guys are making that Hightower is "different" is spot-on. Without question, he is. I expect BFB to go further for him than most. There is a hard limit to that though. That's my point. 53 guys need to be paid I get that. I just figured they moved on from Chandler Jones and Collins with the specific intention of paying Hightower. I hope they still do. I think Smuck's point is hightower is not stupid and realizes the same exact thing.
|
|
|
Post by Just Another Shem on Feb 28, 2017 15:42:33 GMT -5
Understand what you're saying but at some point if you're not going to pay Hightower then who are you going to pay? He plays the position that Belichick values above all. He was homegrown in Bill's system. Any has made two huge plays in back-to-back Super Bowl victories. What more can you possibly ask of the guy? He is also one of only two players on that defense who has proven to be an elite talent. If you're not going to pay him a fair market deal then who are you ever going to pay? This narrative is tired. BFB pays, he even overpays a little (Wilfork, Mankins, McCourty). He just won't overpay a LOT, because it fucks the construction of the roster. There's 52 other guys to pay. What is an overpayment in your mind? Give him Luke Keuchly money and be done with it. The Patriots have cap space out the Wazoo and have only one number on this defense that is making any real money and that is Devin McCourty.
|
|
|
Post by Just Another Shem on Feb 28, 2017 15:48:46 GMT -5
Totally agree. Hightower does seem to be injured quite a bit, but that hardly makes him unique among NFL players. The point that you guys are making that Hightower is "different" is spot-on. Without question, he is. I expect BFB to go further for him than most. There is a hard limit to that though. That's my point. 53 guys need to be paid To be fair of the whole 53 guys need to be paid narrative is tired as well. The Patriots spend less real money then 80% of the teams in the league. And we all know that the cap can be manipulated any which way that you want.
|
|
|
Post by Smuck on Feb 28, 2017 16:00:49 GMT -5
The point that you guys are making that Hightower is "different" is spot-on. Without question, he is. I expect BFB to go further for him than most. There is a hard limit to that though. That's my point. 53 guys need to be paid To be fair of the whole 53 guys need to be paid narrative is tired as well. The Patriots spend less real money then 80% of the teams in the league. And we all know that the cap can be manipulated any which way that you want.This is the part that's dead wrong. Yes, it can be manipulated, but not any which way you want. There's exactly one way to manipulate it--push cap costs to future years, basically fucking your future. You dropped Kuechly's name. If you can get Hightower for that money, I think he does it. 5/61, 34 guaranteed. Something in that range would be great. But with Collins getting 4/50 (26 guaranteed), I'm afraid that DH is looking for way more than Kuechly money.
|
|
|
Post by Smuck on Feb 28, 2017 16:38:55 GMT -5
Hmm Hightower went from "Marquee free agent for the pats" "Give him keuchley money and let's go for #6" "Pay that man!!" "Hightower is a priority" To "Well he is injured often". Yes, those are all quotes btw. I'm the same person who said to "pay that man" and that he's "injured a lot". Both are true of Hightower in my view. He's not a shelf guy. He does miss some time. GP: 14 16 12 12 13. That's not a china doll. I think that he's worth good money. I don't think that anyone is worth WAY TOO MUCH money. Figure out his value, overpay a little, not a lot. Hopefully it gets done. This "Jones and Collins were sent packing to afford Hightower/Butler/et al." is also wrong. Jones was sent packing for howling at the moon during the playoffs, being an edge-rusher only, and having a big payday coming. Not just the last part. Collins was traded for freelancing too much and having a big payday coming. Not just the last part. DH is a good soldier, presents no other on field or off field problems. Only hangup with him is whether he fits the value plan. If someone offers double what he's worth on the field, BFB will spend that money other ways. Been that way 16 years.
|
|
|
Post by Just Another Shem on Feb 28, 2017 16:48:27 GMT -5
To be fair of the whole 53 guys need to be paid narrative is tired as well. The Patriots spend less real money then 80% of the teams in the league. And we all know that the cap can be manipulated any which way that you want.This is the part that's dead wrong. Yes, it can be manipulated, but not any which way you want. There's exactly one way to manipulate it--push cap costs to future years, basically fucking your future. You dropped Kuechly's name. If you can get Hightower for that money, I think he does it. 5/61, 34 guaranteed. Something in that range would be great. But with Collins getting 4/50 (26 guaranteed), I'm afraid that DH is looking for way more than Kuechly money. I simply dont agree with your first paragraph. 10 years ago? Maybe. But now? Look across the landscape of the NFL? Which teams have fucked their future because of cap issues in the 2010's? It doesnt happen anymore. For the Patriots, this is about Bob Kraft saying he only wants to spend X amount of REAL money... not about the salary cap. The Patriots are one of the cheapest organizations in the NFL. Look at the Forbes report for 2016. I believe they were 26th in the NFL in yerms of real dollars spent. Shame on them if they nickel and dime Hightower out of town.
|
|
Gronk
SC member
Gronk SMASH!
Posts: 93
Likes: 28
|
Post by Gronk on Feb 28, 2017 16:53:40 GMT -5
REPORT: PATRIOTS WON'T USE FRANCHISE TAG ON HIGHTOWERBy Phil Perry February 28, 2017 2:38 PM If the Patriots keep Dont'a Hightower in New England for 2017, it looks like they're going to have to make it a multi-year propsition. According to ESPN's Adam Schefter, the team has told Hightower's agent Pat Dye that they will not be using the franchise tag to keep him around. The price tag associated with the franchise designation is expected to be just under $15 million. The free-agency period begins with the start of the new league year on Mar. 9. The Patriots will have exclusive negotiating rights with Hightower until the legal tampering period on Mar. 7, but Schefter's acknowledgement that Hightower is "expected to test [the] market" makes it sound as though a long-term agreement between the two sides is not imminent. Hightower was a first-time captain in 2016 as he helped the Patriots to their second Super Bowl title in the last three seasons. Just as he did when he tackled Marshawn Lynch short of the goal line at the end of Super Bowl XLIX, Hightower made a game-altering play in Super Bowl LI when he strip-sacked Matt Ryan to help fuel the biggest comeback in Super Bowl history. The soon-to-be 27-year-old played in 13 games this season and recorded 2.5 sacks en route to being named to his first Pro Bowl. He served as the team's play-caller in the middle of the field and helped to bring along three linebackers in their first season with the Patriots -- rookie Elandon Roberts, Shea McClellin and Kyle Van Noy -- after Jamie Collins was traded mid-season. Hightower has played through injury at various points during his five seasons with the Patriots, missing 13 games in that span and playing a full 16-game regular season once (2013). However, when he's available, he sees the majority of the playing time. In 2016, he played in 83 percent of the snaps for which he was in uniform. Asked about playing on the franchise tag earlier this month, Hightower replied, "That's a lot of money." Apparently the Patriots feel the same way. www.csnne.com/new-england-patriots/report-patriots-wont-use-franchise-tag-hightower
|
|
Chappion
VIP Member
Posts: 21,128
Likes: 2,166
|
Post by Chappion on Feb 28, 2017 16:54:03 GMT -5
I'm the same person who said to "pay that man" and that he's "injured a lot". Both are true of Hightower in my view. He's not a shelf guy. He does miss some time. GP: 14 16 12 12 13. That's not a china doll. I think that he's worth good money. I don't think that anyone is worth WAY TOO MUCH money. Figure out his value, overpay a little, not a lot. Hopefully it gets done. This "Jones and Collins were sent packing to afford Hightower/Butler/et al." is also wrong. Jones was sent packing for howling at the moon during the playoffs, being an edge-rusher only, and having a big payday coming. Not just the last part. Collins was traded for freelancing too much and having a big payday coming. Not just the last part. DH is a good soldier, presents no other on field or off field problems. Only hangup with him is whether he fits the value plan. If someone offers double what he's worth on the field, BFB will spend that money other ways. Been that way 16 years. Yup. Not arguing any of that. Just disputing the notion Yam was putting out there that Pats fans were souring on Hightower because he might leave.
|
|
|
Post by Just Another Shem on Feb 28, 2017 16:58:01 GMT -5
I'm the same person who said to "pay that man" and that he's "injured a lot". Both are true of Hightower in my view. He's not a shelf guy. He does miss some time. GP: 14 16 12 12 13. That's not a china doll. I think that he's worth good money. I don't think that anyone is worth WAY TOO MUCH money. Figure out his value, overpay a little, not a lot. Hopefully it gets done. This "Jones and Collins were sent packing to afford Hightower/Butler/et al." is also wrong. Jones was sent packing for howling at the moon during the playoffs, being an edge-rusher only, and having a big payday coming. Not just the last part. Collins was traded for freelancing too much and having a big payday coming. Not just the last part. DH is a good soldier, presents no other on field or off field problems. Only hangup with him is whether he fits the value plan. If someone offers double what he's worth on the field, BFB will spend that money other ways. Been that way 16 years. You have a proven commodity that you know works and that you know wins. They have cap space out the fucking dick. Shame on them if they nickel and dime a player that they know fits and that they know works and that they can get for fair market value. You bash Jeremy Jacobs for this very behavior.
|
|
tigertowner 68
VIP Member
SportsChatter Featured Writer
Hangin' in and wife improving
Posts: 14,127
Likes: 2,889
|
Post by tigertowner 68 on Feb 28, 2017 17:44:50 GMT -5
Big mistake there! I figured they were keeping Hightower. Especially once they unloaded Collins and Chandler Jones. Tag number is huge, because it includes pass rushing OLBs. I'd probably tag him, but I trust BFB. I wouldn't pay him 4 @ whatever the difference between him and Jones is (4/64?). Too much. Why would anyone not trust BFB?
|
|
|
Post by Just Another Shem on Feb 28, 2017 17:45:38 GMT -5
I simply dont agree with your first paragraph. 10 years ago? Maybe. But now? Look across the landscape of the NFL? Which teams have fucked their future because of cap issues in the 2010's? It doesnt happen anymore. For the Patriots, this is about Bob Kraft saying he only wants to spend X amount of REAL money... not about the salary cap. The Patriots are one of the cheapest organizations in the NFL. Look at the Forbes report for 2016. I believe they were 26th in the NFL in yerms of real dollars spent. Shame on them if they nickel and dime Hightower out of town. You're a fucking retard. They just won 2 of the last 3 Super Bowls, and Kraft is a cheap motherfucker. Pointless talking with you 26th out of 32 teams in actual money spent in 2016. Fact, not opinion. Argue with Forbes, if you must. Nickel and diming Donta Hightower is a cheapskate move. Where are they spending money, Smuck? They have a great QB at a dirt cheap price. They have bargain basement running backs, bargain basement WRs, Gronk and Bennett made some money.. thrift store offensive linemen, bargain basement defensive linemen, retread projects at LB making no money, dirt cheap cornerbacks. And one well paid safety. Where are they spending the money, Smuck? Where? You tell me? Where are they spending any money whatsoever? Marcus Cannon and his extension? Marcus Cannon? Look dude, I get the whole in Bill we trust... I get it. But at some point? When do we start asking questions at them gutting one lynch pin after another on defense and paying absolutely nobody? They are a fucking cheapskate organization that has nickel and dimed players for every bit of the 16 years you just described. Me? I like winning Super Bowls. And they can't afford to let Hightower or Butler go. They can't do it. And shame on them if they do. How big does Kraft's yacht gotta be?
|
|
|
Post by Swamp Dragon on Feb 28, 2017 18:10:02 GMT -5
REPORT: PATRIOTS WON'T USE FRANCHISE TAG ON HIGHTOWERBy Phil Perry February 28, 2017 2:38 PM If the Patriots keep Dont'a Hightower in New England for 2017, it looks like they're going to have to make it a multi-year propsition. According to ESPN's Adam Schefter, the team has told Hightower's agent Pat Dye that they will not be using the franchise tag to keep him around. The price tag associated with the franchise designation is expected to be just under $15 million. The free-agency period begins with the start of the new league year on Mar. 9. The Patriots will have exclusive negotiating rights with Hightower until the legal tampering period on Mar. 7, but Schefter's acknowledgement that Hightower is "expected to test [the] market" makes it sound as though a long-term agreement between the two sides is not imminent. Hightower was a first-time captain in 2016 as he helped the Patriots to their second Super Bowl title in the last three seasons. Just as he did when he tackled Marshawn Lynch short of the goal line at the end of Super Bowl XLIX, Hightower made a game-altering play in Super Bowl LI when he strip-sacked Matt Ryan to help fuel the biggest comeback in Super Bowl history. The soon-to-be 27-year-old played in 13 games this season and recorded 2.5 sacks en route to being named to his first Pro Bowl. He served as the team's play-caller in the middle of the field and helped to bring along three linebackers in their first season with the Patriots -- rookie Elandon Roberts, Shea McClellin and Kyle Van Noy -- after Jamie Collins was traded mid-season. Hightower has played through injury at various points during his five seasons with the Patriots, missing 13 games in that span and playing a full 16-game regular season once (2013). However, when he's available, he sees the majority of the playing time. In 2016, he played in 83 percent of the snaps for which he was in uniform. Asked about playing on the franchise tag earlier this month, Hightower replied, "That's a lot of money." Apparently the Patriots feel the same way. www.csnne.com/new-england-patriots/report-patriots-wont-use-franchise-tag-hightower Hits too high cause all the edge rushers like Von Miller making the LB cap abnormally high
|
|
|
Post by Zig on Feb 28, 2017 18:13:00 GMT -5
REPORT: PATRIOTS WON'T USE FRANCHISE TAG ON HIGHTOWERBy Phil Perry February 28, 2017 2:38 PM If the Patriots keep Dont'a Hightower in New England for 2017, it looks like they're going to have to make it a multi-year propsition. According to ESPN's Adam Schefter, the team has told Hightower's agent Pat Dye that they will not be using the franchise tag to keep him around. The price tag associated with the franchise designation is expected to be just under $15 million. The free-agency period begins with the start of the new league year on Mar. 9. The Patriots will have exclusive negotiating rights with Hightower until the legal tampering period on Mar. 7, but Schefter's acknowledgement that Hightower is "expected to test [the] market" makes it sound as though a long-term agreement between the two sides is not imminent. Hightower was a first-time captain in 2016 as he helped the Patriots to their second Super Bowl title in the last three seasons. Just as he did when he tackled Marshawn Lynch short of the goal line at the end of Super Bowl XLIX, Hightower made a game-altering play in Super Bowl LI when he strip-sacked Matt Ryan to help fuel the biggest comeback in Super Bowl history. The soon-to-be 27-year-old played in 13 games this season and recorded 2.5 sacks en route to being named to his first Pro Bowl. He served as the team's play-caller in the middle of the field and helped to bring along three linebackers in their first season with the Patriots -- rookie Elandon Roberts, Shea McClellin and Kyle Van Noy -- after Jamie Collins was traded mid-season. Hightower has played through injury at various points during his five seasons with the Patriots, missing 13 games in that span and playing a full 16-game regular season once (2013). However, when he's available, he sees the majority of the playing time. In 2016, he played in 83 percent of the snaps for which he was in uniform. Asked about playing on the franchise tag earlier this month, Hightower replied, "That's a lot of money." Apparently the Patriots feel the same way. www.csnne.com/new-england-patriots/report-patriots-wont-use-franchise-tag-hightower Hits too high cause all the edge rushers like Von Miller making the LB cap abnormally high yep, no distinction between inside/outside LBs. I'm cautiously optimistic they get a deal done though
|
|
Gronk
SC member
Gronk SMASH!
Posts: 93
Likes: 28
|
Post by Gronk on Mar 7, 2017 18:08:06 GMT -5
Patriots Offer Malcolm Butler First-Round TenderMarch 7, 2017 5:52 PM BOSTON (CBS) — The Patriots have offered a first-round tender to pending restricted free agent cornerback Malcolm Butler just two days before the NFL’s free agency period begins on Thursday at 4 p.m. The news comes after the Patriots also tendered offers to tackle Cameron Fleming, cornerback Justin Coleman, and tight end Matt Lengel. Butler’s first-round tender is worth $3.91 million. If Butler becomes a restricted free agent, any team who would potentially sign him to an offer sheet would now have to send the Patriots a first-round pick as compensation if they declined to match the offer. The news is significant for the Patriots and Butler – not necessarily because of the first-round compensation, but because the two sides still do not appear close to reaching an agreement on a long-term contract extension. Butler is now likely to hit restricted free agency on Thursday and become a candidate for an offer sheet. boston.cbslocal.com/2017/03/07/patriots-offer-malcolm-butler-first-round-tender/
|
|
|
Post by Zig on Mar 7, 2017 18:15:17 GMT -5
Patriots Offer Malcolm Butler First-Round TenderMarch 7, 2017 5:52 PM BOSTON (CBS) — The Patriots have offered a first-round tender to pending restricted free agent cornerback Malcolm Butler just two days before the NFL’s free agency period begins on Thursday at 4 p.m. The news comes after the Patriots also tendered offers to tackle Cameron Fleming, cornerback Justin Coleman, and tight end Matt Lengel. Butler’s first-round tender is worth $3.91 million. If Butler becomes a restricted free agent, any team who would potentially sign him to an offer sheet would now have to send the Patriots a first-round pick as compensation if they declined to match the offer. The news is significant for the Patriots and Butler – not necessarily because of the first-round compensation, but because the two sides still do not appear close to reaching an agreement on a long-term contract extension. Butler is now likely to hit restricted free agency on Thursday and become a candidate for an offer sheet. boston.cbslocal.com/2017/03/07/patriots-offer-malcolm-butler-first-round-tender/ beat me to it! Bolded part sucks, they have to freaking pay some of these guys or it's right back to the crappy D of a few years ago. I dont get it sometimes, took so long to get back to respectable -find good players and now they either trade them off or try to low ball 'em...
|
|
Gronk
SC member
Gronk SMASH!
Posts: 93
Likes: 28
|
Post by Gronk on Mar 7, 2017 18:20:17 GMT -5
Patriots Offer Malcolm Butler First-Round TenderMarch 7, 2017 5:52 PM BOSTON (CBS) — The Patriots have offered a first-round tender to pending restricted free agent cornerback Malcolm Butler just two days before the NFL’s free agency period begins on Thursday at 4 p.m. The news comes after the Patriots also tendered offers to tackle Cameron Fleming, cornerback Justin Coleman, and tight end Matt Lengel. Butler’s first-round tender is worth $3.91 million. If Butler becomes a restricted free agent, any team who would potentially sign him to an offer sheet would now have to send the Patriots a first-round pick as compensation if they declined to match the offer. The news is significant for the Patriots and Butler – not necessarily because of the first-round compensation, but because the two sides still do not appear close to reaching an agreement on a long-term contract extension. Butler is now likely to hit restricted free agency on Thursday and become a candidate for an offer sheet. boston.cbslocal.com/2017/03/07/patriots-offer-malcolm-butler-first-round-tender/ beat me to it! Bolded part sucks, they have to freaking pay some of these guys or it's right back to the crappy D of a few years ago. I dont get it sometimes, took so long to get back to respectable -find good players and now they either trade them off or try to low ball 'em... I hear ya
|
|