|
|
Post by Zig on Jun 2, 2014 7:00:00 GMT -5
Make your pick and discuss the NHL Finals here
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 2, 2014 7:07:21 GMT -5
dirt, what is a puck made out of?
|
|
|
|
Post by NEW YORK on Jun 2, 2014 7:08:48 GMT -5
dirt, what is a puck made out of? Slightest idea But NY and LA Hockey bigs must have just ejaculated A Stanley Cup with ratings |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 2, 2014 7:10:54 GMT -5
dirt, what is a puck made out of? Slightest idea But NY and LA Hockey bigs must have just ejaculated A Stanley Cup with ratings NHL is happy it has NY in the cup finals not so much LA..dirt, LA is a great sports market, but akin to tampa as a baseball market equivalent...the NHL would have preferred chicago (2 original 6's) a guy named martinez scored the OT GWer...not mexican |
|
|
|
Post by NEW YORK on Jun 2, 2014 7:13:04 GMT -5
Slightest idea But NY and LA Hockey bigs must have just ejaculated A Stanley Cup with ratings NHL is happy it has NY in the cup finals not so much LA..dirt, LA is a great sports market, but akin to tampa as a baseball market equivalent...the NHL would have preferred chicago (2 original 6's) a guy named martinez scored the OT GWer...not mexican I watched much of that game, lotta fun I was hoping for that awful Blackhawks goaltender As a die hard Rangers fan, this Kings team and their ability under pressure is scary |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 2, 2014 7:15:46 GMT -5
NHL is happy it has NY in the cup finals not so much LA..dirt, LA is a great sports market, but akin to tampa as a baseball market equivalent...the NHL would have preferred chicago (2 original 6's) a guy named martinez scored the OT GWer...not mexican I watched much of that game, lotta fun I was hoping for that awful Blackhawks goaltender As a die hard Rangers fan, this Kings team and their ability under pressure is scary awesome new englander jonathan quick...avon old farms baby! he IS the kings |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 2, 2014 7:20:01 GMT -5
rocks cup prediction
kings in 6 or 7
but i am on record i am pulling for NY,...i want an original 6 and eastern team to win it
no mexican cup parades again
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 2, 2014 7:24:09 GMT -5
rocks cup prediction kings in 6 or 7 but i am on record i am pulling for NY,...i want an original 6 and eastern team to win it no mexican cup parades again Lol Unreal hawks would have probably won in 5 kings are a better matchup, but they have the edge in a few key areas dirt im old skool...i want an original 6 and an eastern team (my bruins conference) to win it 20 years is a long time..you were still knee deep in michelle beadle |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 2, 2014 8:07:51 GMT -5
MD
youre our only real wranglers fan
predictions?
|
|
|
|
Post by MoonDriven on Jun 2, 2014 8:12:44 GMT -5
MD youre our only real wranglers fan predictions? Rangers in 6 at home LA is too tired after playing 21 games, basically only one full day off, travel won't help. Quick looks like shit this postseason |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 2, 2014 8:14:00 GMT -5
MD youre our only real wranglers fan predictions? Rangers in 6 at home LA is too tired after playing 21 games, basically only one full day off, travel won't help. Quick looks like shit this postseason pulling for you i see kings in 6 or 7...but yeah, theyre beat...i could be wrong, i hope i am for jeters sake first team ever to play all 21 games going into the cup final madness |
|
|
|
Post by NEW YORK on Jun 2, 2014 8:14:02 GMT -5
MD youre our only real wranglers fan predictions? Youre a Rangers Fan too BWAAHAHAHAHA! |
|
|
|
Post by redsoxworrld on Jun 2, 2014 8:14:17 GMT -5
remember when hockey titles didnt mean shit in 2011?
and for the record, could give a shit less who wins the Cup, but prefer LA
that tying goal by Gaborik last night.........wow, what reflexes on that rebound
wasn't he a Ranger a couple years ago?
|
|
|
|
Post by NEW YORK on Jun 2, 2014 8:15:17 GMT -5
Rangers in 6 at home LA is too tired after playing 21 games, basically only one full day off, travel won't help. Quick looks like shit this postseason pulling for you i see kings in 6 or 7...but yeah, theyre beat...i could be wrong, i hope i am for jeters sake first team ever to play all 21 games going into the cup final madness Jeeze Man, Pick a side, no one is gonna shoot ya Rangers Win - "I was pulling for the Rangers" Kings Win - "Like I said, Kings win this series" Jeeze, no one plays both sides like Rock |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 2, 2014 8:17:28 GMT -5
pulling for you i see kings in 6 or 7...but yeah, theyre beat...i could be wrong, i hope i am for jeters sake first team ever to play all 21 games going into the cup final madness Jeeze Man, Pick a side, no one is gonna shoot ya Rangers Win - "I was pulling for the Rangers" Kings Win - "Like I said, Kings win this series" Jeeze, no one plays both sides like Rock ive picked a side i want to win the rangers ive also said the kings are a very tough matchup which is why is aid kings in 6 or 7, it comes down to goaltending and to me quick >>> henrick...along with the kings having been there recently. again dirt, 965th time...i want the rangers to win |
|
|
|
Post by The Bag on Jun 2, 2014 8:21:51 GMT -5
MD youre our only real wranglers fan predictions? Rangers in 6 at home LA is too tired after playing 21 games, basically only one full day off, travel won't help. Quick looks like shit this postseason rangers have played 21 games also, numerous vs backup goalies. carter said it best (regardless of the fact he is a fag) "if youre tired for game 1 of the finals, something is wrong with u" end of the day, kings have the better offense, rangers better defense, draw on goalies, and kings have WAY more depth. kings in 6. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 2, 2014 8:24:26 GMT -5
Rangers in 6 at home LA is too tired after playing 21 games, basically only one full day off, travel won't help. Quick looks like shit this postseason rangers have played 21 games also, numerous vs backup goalies. carter said it best (regardless of the fact he is a fag) "if youre tired for game 1 of the finals, something is wrong with u" end of the day, kings have the better offense, rangers better defense, draw on goalies, and kings have WAY more depth. kings in 6. this its gonna be a great series i hope NY wins tho, i cant stand CA hockey fans |
|
|
|
Post by MoonDriven on Jun 2, 2014 8:30:39 GMT -5
Rangers in 6 at home LA is too tired after playing 21 games, basically only one full day off, travel won't help. Quick looks like shit this postseason pulling for you i see kings in 6 or 7...but yeah, theyre beat...i could be wrong, i hope i am for jeters sake first team ever to play all 21 games going into the cup final madness I wouldn't be shocked if LA won in 6 Just think the rangers defense and Lundqvist can shut them down. They split the season series, and the second half of the season, the rangers were the much better team. A lot of people forget it took a while for them to get AV's system going |
|
|
|
Post by MoonDriven on Jun 2, 2014 8:36:15 GMT -5
Rangers in 6 at home LA is too tired after playing 21 games, basically only one full day off, travel won't help. Quick looks like shit this postseason rangers have played 21 games also, numerous vs backup goalies. carter said it best (regardless of the fact he is a fag) "if youre tired for game 1 of the finals, something is wrong with u" end of the day, kings have the better offense, rangers better defense, draw on goalies, and kings have WAY more depth. kings in 6. Ranger only played 20 games And how is Quick and Lundqvist a draw? Quick being a top goalie is a myth. Look at his numbers, this isn't 2012 anymore.. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 2, 2014 8:43:52 GMT -5
rangers have played 21 games also, numerous vs backup goalies. carter said it best (regardless of the fact he is a fag) "if youre tired for game 1 of the finals, something is wrong with u" end of the day, kings have the better offense, rangers better defense, draw on goalies, and kings have WAY more depth. kings in 6. Ranger only played 20 games And how is Quick and Lundqvist a draw? Quick being a top goalie is a myth. Look at his numbers, this isn't 2012 anymore.. correction kings are the first team to play all 21 games and win every game 7 on the road |
|
|
|
Post by The Bag on Jun 2, 2014 8:45:29 GMT -5
rangers have played 21 games also, numerous vs backup goalies. carter said it best (regardless of the fact he is a fag) "if youre tired for game 1 of the finals, something is wrong with u" end of the day, kings have the better offense, rangers better defense, draw on goalies, and kings have WAY more depth. kings in 6. Ranger only played 20 games And how is Quick and Lundqvist a draw? Quick being a top goalie is a myth. Look at his numbers, this isn't 2012 anymore.. oh well that one less gp will make all the difference *fart* if you dont think quick is a top goalie, you havent watched him in the playoffs. several times hawks had that game on their stick and he stopped it. stop looking at numbers. youre going to sound like the bandwagon fans, and i know you are better than that lol. |
|
|
|
Post by MoonDriven on Jun 2, 2014 8:57:40 GMT -5
Ranger only played 20 games And how is Quick and Lundqvist a draw? Quick being a top goalie is a myth. Look at his numbers, this isn't 2012 anymore.. oh well that one less gp will make all the difference *fart* if you dont think quick is a top goalie, you havent watched him in the playoffs. several times hawks had that game on their stick and he stopped it. stop looking at numbers. youre going to sound like the bandwagon fans, and i know you are better than that lol. Well if he wasn't giving up 4 goals a game against Chicago they would never be in that position The Kings are a very very good team, this will be no cake walk. BUT, this is a different rangers team, that is playing extremely well. Last 40 games:NYR: 25-11-4 LAK: 21-15-4 Total ROW:NYR: 41 LAK: 38 |
|
|
|
Post by The Bag on Jun 2, 2014 9:10:26 GMT -5
oh well that one less gp will make all the difference *fart* if you dont think quick is a top goalie, you havent watched him in the playoffs. several times hawks had that game on their stick and he stopped it. stop looking at numbers. youre going to sound like the bandwagon fans, and i know you are better than that lol. Well if he wasn't giving up 4 goals a game against Chicago they would never be in that position The Kings are a very very good team, this will be no cake walk. BUT, this is a different rangers team, that is playing extremely well. Last 40 games:NYR: 25-11-4 LAK: 21-15-4 Total ROW:NYR: 41 LAK: 38 did you watch the game last night? most goals by both teams were gift deflections/tips. and did you really go by the last 40 games? lol. when the kings won their last cup, they snuck in as an 8 seed. while the rangers have been beating up on backups and riding henrik's back, the kings have beaten all superior teams to the entire east. |
|
|
|
Post by b1ake on Jun 2, 2014 9:12:53 GMT -5
Well if he wasn't giving up 4 goals a game against Chicago they would never be in that position The Kings are a very very good team, this will be no cake walk. BUT, this is a different rangers team, that is playing extremely well. Last 40 games:NYR: 25-11-4 LAK: 21-15-4 Total ROW:NYR: 41 LAK: 38 did you watch the game last night? most goals by both teams were gift deflections/tips. I did. This is true. You're all welcome. |
|
|
|
Post by MoonDriven on Jun 2, 2014 9:17:07 GMT -5
Well if he wasn't giving up 4 goals a game against Chicago they would never be in that position The Kings are a very very good team, this will be no cake walk. BUT, this is a different rangers team, that is playing extremely well. Last 40 games:NYR: 25-11-4 LAK: 21-15-4 Total ROW:NYR: 41 LAK: 38 did you watch the game last night? most goals by both teams were gift deflections/tips. and did you really go by the last 40 games? lol. when the kings won their last cup, they snuck in as an 8 seed. while the rangers have been beating up on backups and riding henrik's back, the kings have beaten all superior teams to the entire east. I missed the 2nd period, and yes there were a lot of flukey goals.. The Kings are a scary team, but Quick isn't the scary part IMO, it's their forwards And Tokarski played better than Quick last round.. The Kings have a good team, but they are not unbeatable. But people want to keep under estimating how good this Rangers team and AV as a coach. Not to mention, AV is very familiar with the Kings... |
|
|
|
Post by The Bag on Jun 2, 2014 9:30:20 GMT -5
did you watch the game last night? most goals by both teams were gift deflections/tips. and did you really go by the last 40 games? lol. when the kings won their last cup, they snuck in as an 8 seed. while the rangers have been beating up on backups and riding henrik's back, the kings have beaten all superior teams to the entire east. I missed the 2nd period, and yes there were a lot of flukey goals.. The Kings are a scary team, but Quick isn't the scary part IMO, it's their forwards And Tokarski played better than Quick last round.. The Kings have a good team, but they are not unbeatable. But people want to keep under estimating how good this Rangers team and AV as a coach. Not to mention, AV is very familiar with the Kings... their forwards (mostly their depth at forward) is their strength. quick is like strength 1a. and are you seriously comparing playing vs the rangers offense to playing the hawks offense? sorry man. rangers are in the finals, but their o is easily their weakest link. to compare their two performances is just silly. i think it's very possible the rangers win simply bc henrik CAN steal a series, i just dont see it. |
|
|
|
Post by MoonDriven on Jun 2, 2014 10:16:51 GMT -5
I missed the 2nd period, and yes there were a lot of flukey goals.. The Kings are a scary team, but Quick isn't the scary part IMO, it's their forwards And Tokarski played better than Quick last round.. The Kings have a good team, but they are not unbeatable. But people want to keep under estimating how good this Rangers team and AV as a coach. Not to mention, AV is very familiar with the Kings... their forwards (mostly their depth at forward) is their strength. quick is like strength 1a. and are you seriously comparing playing vs the rangers offense to playing the hawks offense? sorry man. rangers are in the finals, but their o is easily their weakest link. to compare their two performances is just silly. i think it's very possible the rangers win simply bc henrik CAN steal a series, i just dont see it. Chicago is the most high powered offense in the league IMO, but the Rangers don't have to be as good as them. The Ranger outscored LA this year, and that was with a brand new coach. This team has been rolling since they finally got their system in place. Either way, should be a fun 6/7 game series I can see either team winning |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 2, 2014 10:19:43 GMT -5
their forwards (mostly their depth at forward) is their strength. quick is like strength 1a. and are you seriously comparing playing vs the rangers offense to playing the hawks offense? sorry man. rangers are in the finals, but their o is easily their weakest link. to compare their two performances is just silly. i think it's very possible the rangers win simply bc henrik CAN steal a series, i just dont see it. Chicago is the most high powered offense in the league IMO, but the Rangers don't have to be as good as them. The Ranger outscored LA this year, and that was with a brand new coach. This team has been rolling since they finally got their system in place. Either way, should be a fun 6/7 game series I can see either team winning i remember when the rangers were left for dead dirt still thought they were a handball team amazing turn around |
|
|
|
Post by The Bag on Jun 2, 2014 10:29:01 GMT -5
their forwards (mostly their depth at forward) is their strength. quick is like strength 1a. and are you seriously comparing playing vs the rangers offense to playing the hawks offense? sorry man. rangers are in the finals, but their o is easily their weakest link. to compare their two performances is just silly. i think it's very possible the rangers win simply bc henrik CAN steal a series, i just dont see it. Chicago is the most high powered offense in the league IMO, but the Rangers don't have to be as good as them. The Ranger outscored LA this year, and that was with a brand new coach. This team has been rolling since they finally got their system in place. Either way, should be a fun 6/7 game series I can see either team winning so you agree the hawks have an awesome offense, but you compared the goalie who faced the #1 offense vs the goalie who faced, well, the rangers offense. cmon dude. itll be a good series, but will be very similar to nj/la a few years ago UNLESS la comes in with a "we already won" attitude (which i dont see happening). |
|
|
|
Post by MoonDriven on Jun 2, 2014 10:44:09 GMT -5
Chicago is the most high powered offense in the league IMO, but the Rangers don't have to be as good as them. The Ranger outscored LA this year, and that was with a brand new coach. This team has been rolling since they finally got their system in place. Either way, should be a fun 6/7 game series I can see either team winning so you agree the hawks have an awesome offense, but you compared the goalie who faced the #1 offense vs the goalie who faced, well, the rangers offense. cmon dude. itll be a good series, but will be very similar to nj/la a few years ago UNLESS la comes in with a "we already won" attitude (which i dont see happening). Well you also think Quick is better than Lundqvist for some reason.. I guess because he played on a better team and has a cup? LA already said this might be the toughest matchup they have due to the Rangers strong D and Goalie. I can't wait |
|
