|
|
Post by The Bag on Nov 14, 2014 12:33:57 GMT -5
yes. now just read what YOU said. "they just need two starting pitchers and they are set" you said this actually. Assuming they can bring in two legit starting pitchers Boston is very well set up for next season. Read more: sportschatter.co/thread/720/habs-over-bills-trout-kershaw?page=1#ixzz3J43SICTLi said they arent "very well set", and i also pointed out it isnt THAT easy to just go and get two front end pitchers. so what we said was VERY different. dirt will accept your apology now im sure. You regurgitated exactly what I said. I even challenged you to tell me who you were taking out of the seven guys I said are pretty good locks to start next season. You couldn't do it. You agreed with everything I said. false. completely false. you said "they get two pitchers, they are very well set". i said "yes, but you cant just go out and get two top end starters". when you asked who they were taking out, i replied. so jbj went from "being shafted from the gg" to being cut/traded? betts went from being a "top" infield prospect to being a starting cf? victorino is now going to be cut/traded for nothing? what do you expect to get back for jbj and shane? im not expecting much at all, and that just leaves more they need to replace. the sox have the chance to make lots of good moves, and lots of bad moves. its not as easy as youre making it out to be. Read more: sportschatter.co/thread/720/habs-over-bills-trout-kershaw?page=7#ixzz3J46zpZwFi also noted that guys you have listed (especially betts) are guys you may need to pony up to GET those top end starters. im feeling like pesci in casino when he's too tired to knock a guy out in one shot. dirt, handle this. |
|
|
|
Post by Just Another Shem on Nov 14, 2014 12:34:10 GMT -5
If the Yankees add 2 all star bats, they should be in good shape They have the worst infield in baseball and and a MASH unit in the rotation. |
|
|
|
Post by Just Another Shem on Nov 14, 2014 12:36:24 GMT -5
You regurgitated exactly what I said. I even challenged you to tell me who you were taking out of the seven guys I said are pretty good locks to start next season. You couldn't do it. You agreed with everything I said. false. completely false. you said "they get two pitchers, they are very well set". i said "yes, but you cant just go out and get two top end starters". when you asked who they were taking out, i replied. so jbj went from "being shafted from the gg" to being cut/traded? betts went from being a "top" infield prospect to being a starting cf? victorino is now going to be cut/traded for nothing? what do you expect to get back for jbj and shane? im not expecting much at all, and that just leaves more they need to replace. the sox have the chance to make lots of good moves, and lots of bad moves. its not as easy as youre making it out to be. Read more: sportschatter.co/thread/720/habs-over-bills-trout-kershaw?page=7#ixzz3J46zpZwFi also noted that guys you have listed (especially betts) are guys you may need to pony up to GET those top end starters. im feeling like pesci in casino when he's too tired to knock a guy out in one shot. dirt, handle this. So you agreed with everything I said. |
|
|
|
Post by Just Another Shem on Nov 14, 2014 12:37:11 GMT -5
Yam, you're supposed to be a Red Sox fan and you don't understand why Betts has to play in the OF?
SMFH
|
|
|
|
Post by The Bag on Nov 14, 2014 12:39:36 GMT -5
false. completely false. you said "they get two pitchers, they are very well set". i said "yes, but you cant just go out and get two top end starters". when you asked who they were taking out, i replied. so jbj went from "being shafted from the gg" to being cut/traded? betts went from being a "top" infield prospect to being a starting cf? victorino is now going to be cut/traded for nothing? what do you expect to get back for jbj and shane? im not expecting much at all, and that just leaves more they need to replace. the sox have the chance to make lots of good moves, and lots of bad moves. its not as easy as youre making it out to be. Read more: sportschatter.co/thread/720/habs-over-bills-trout-kershaw?page=7#ixzz3J46zpZwFi also noted that guys you have listed (especially betts) are guys you may need to pony up to GET those top end starters. im feeling like pesci in casino when he's too tired to knock a guy out in one shot. dirt, handle this. So you agreed with everything I said. not at all. continue mumbling to yourself youre right. you will be, right after the sox sign two top end starters at "Ace Hut". |
|
|
|
Post by The Bag on Nov 14, 2014 12:41:21 GMT -5
Yam, you're supposed to be a Red Sox fan and you don't understand why Betts has to play in the OF? SMFH i understand why he is playing there. when a stud prospect is changing positions, that says something. when he's changing positions, to play a position formerly owned by a stud prospect who has now lost his job to a 2b, that says something too. |
|
|
|
Post by Just Another Shem on Nov 14, 2014 12:41:50 GMT -5
"Red Sox need two starters, a 3B and a C"
"No, idiot, hey need two starters, a 3B and a C"
|
|
|
|
Post by The Bag on Nov 14, 2014 12:43:25 GMT -5
"Red Sox need two starters, a 3B and a C" "No, idiot, hey need two starters, a 3B and a C" "red sox need two starters and they are very well set" = "red sox need two starters, a catcher, and a 3b" - The Snoogleburglar |
|
|
|
Post by Just Another Shem on Nov 14, 2014 12:43:59 GMT -5
Yam, you're supposed to be a Red Sox fan and you don't understand why Betts has to play in the OF? SMFH i understand why he is playing there. when a stud prospect is changing positions, that says something. when he's changing positions, to play a position formerly owned by a stud prospect who has now lost his job to a 2b, that says something too. Yes. It says he plays a position where he team just signed a guy to a $100 million contract. Ergo, he needs a new position. |
|
|
|
Post by Just Another Shem on Nov 14, 2014 12:45:39 GMT -5
I'm also assuming that as much as I don't want hem to do it, here gonna sign Sandoval or Hanley to play 3B.
THey have $55-$60 mil to spend this off season, FYI.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Bag on Nov 14, 2014 12:47:12 GMT -5
i understand why he is playing there. when a stud prospect is changing positions, that says something. when he's changing positions, to play a position formerly owned by a stud prospect who has now lost his job to a 2b, that says something too. Yes. It says he plays a position where he team just signed a guy to a $100 million contract. Ergo, he needs a new position. yes, and he is immediately taking the job of another "stud prospect" in jbj. i dont think youre following at all. |
|
|
|
Post by The Bag on Nov 14, 2014 12:47:34 GMT -5
I'm also assuming that as much as I don't want hem to do it, here gonna sign Sandoval or Hanley to play 3B. THey have $55-$60 mil to spend this off season, FYI. just bc it's there to spend, doesnt mean you NEED to spend it. |
|
|
|
Post by Super Paul Mullin on Nov 14, 2014 12:52:37 GMT -5
Let Holt play third. All money should go to 2 starters, re-signing Miller and maybe a starting catcher with Vazquez as the backup.
|
|
|
|
Post by Just Another Shem on Nov 14, 2014 12:53:00 GMT -5
Yes. It says he plays a position where he team just signed a guy to a $100 million contract. Ergo, he needs a new position. yes, and he is immediately taking the job of another "stud prospect" in jbj. i dont think youre following at all. So Betts shouldn't play this year? That's what you're saying? |
|
|
|
Post by The Bag on Nov 14, 2014 12:54:19 GMT -5
Let Holt play third. All money should go to 2 starters, re-signing Miller and maybe a starting catcher with Vazquez as the backup. i said holt playing 3b. |
|
|
|
Post by Just Another Shem on Nov 14, 2014 12:54:24 GMT -5
I'm also assuming that as much as I don't want hem to do it, here gonna sign Sandoval or Hanley to play 3B. THey have $55-$60 mil to spend this off season, FYI. just bc it's there to spend, doesnt mean you NEED to spend it. So you say hat hey have all sorts of holes to fill... But they shouldn't spend the available budget? |
|
|
|
Post by The Bag on Nov 14, 2014 12:56:12 GMT -5
yes, and he is immediately taking the job of another "stud prospect" in jbj. i dont think youre following at all. So Betts shouldn't play this year? That's what you're saying? if you werent a retarded monkey, you would have seen i said betts may have to be moved to bring in the guys they need to fill holes of. so im saying, if im cherrington, im shopping betts for a solid 3b or a top end starter if i cant sign 2 of the big names out there. |
|
|
|
Post by The Bag on Nov 14, 2014 12:57:24 GMT -5
just bc it's there to spend, doesnt mean you NEED to spend it. So you say hat hey have all sorts of holes to fill... But they shouldn't spend the available budget? they shouldnt spend just to spend. |
|
|
|
Post by Just Another Shem on Nov 14, 2014 12:59:35 GMT -5
So Betts shouldn't play this year? That's what you're saying? if you werent a retarded monkey, you would have seen i said betts may have to be moved to bring in the guys they need to fill holes of. so im saying, if im cherrington, im shopping betts for a solid 3b or a top end starter if i cant sign 2 of the big names out there. So what you are really saying is... If they trade their starting center fielder, they will have a hole in center field? |
|
lemiwinks
VIP Member
Posts: 44,029 
Likes: 4,976
|
Post by lemiwinks on Nov 14, 2014 13:00:20 GMT -5
Let Holt play third. All money should go to 2 starters, re-signing Miller and maybe a starting catcher with Vazquez as the backup. they arent signing 2 starters....... I see them going all out on Lester.... they have 100 mil committed to 10 players right? and its not an overly impressive 10 |
|
lemiwinks
VIP Member
Posts: 44,029
Likes: 4,976
|
Post by lemiwinks on Nov 14, 2014 13:02:24 GMT -5
and that doesnt count any arbitration numbers....
|
|
lemiwinks
VIP Member
Posts: 44,029
Likes: 4,976
|
Post by lemiwinks on Nov 14, 2014 13:05:31 GMT -5
Yankees have 171 mil committed to 11 players.....and it looks even worse than the redsox.
|
|
|
|
Post by Super Paul Mullin on Nov 14, 2014 13:07:59 GMT -5
Let Holt play third. All money should go to 2 starters, re-signing Miller and maybe a starting catcher with Vazquez as the backup. they arent signing 2 starters....... I see them going all out on Lester.... they have 100 mil committed to 10 players right? and its not an overly impressive 10 Yeah about 110 for 10. Napoli, Ortiz, Victorino, Castillo, Pedroia, Mujica, Koji, Buchholz, Cespedes, and Craig. |
|
|
|
Post by The Bag on Nov 14, 2014 13:12:08 GMT -5
if you werent a retarded monkey, you would have seen i said betts may have to be moved to bring in the guys they need to fill holes of. so im saying, if im cherrington, im shopping betts for a solid 3b or a top end starter if i cant sign 2 of the big names out there. So what you are really saying is... If they trade their starting center fielder, they will have a hole in center field? no. they have the guy who "was robbed of the gold glove by being sent down", right? you'll catch on eventually. or, you will continue to think teams will simply give the sox awesome players for nothing. |
|
|
|
Post by Just Another Shem on Nov 14, 2014 13:15:10 GMT -5
So what you are really saying is... If they trade their starting center fielder, they will have a hole in center field? no. they have the guy who "was robbed of the gold glove by being sent down", right? you'll catch on eventually. or, you will continue to think teams will simply give the sox awesome players for nothing. So they need a 3B and a C and 2 starters? |
|
lemiwinks
VIP Member
Posts: 44,029
Likes: 4,976
|
Post by lemiwinks on Nov 14, 2014 13:17:31 GMT -5
they arent signing 2 starters....... I see them going all out on Lester.... they have 100 mil committed to 10 players right? and its not an overly impressive 10 Yeah about 110 for 10. Napoli, Ortiz, Victorino, Castillo, Pedroia, Mujica, Koji, Buchholz, Cespedes, and Craig. ouch.....and is anyone going to get a good arbitration payday? |
|
lemiwinks
VIP Member
Posts: 44,029
Likes: 4,976
|
Post by lemiwinks on Nov 14, 2014 13:19:13 GMT -5
no. they have the guy who "was robbed of the gold glove by being sent down", right? you'll catch on eventually. or, you will continue to think teams will simply give the sox awesome players for nothing. So they need a 3B and a C and 2 starters? just to get back to average. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 14, 2014 13:21:54 GMT -5
So you say hat hey have all sorts of holes to fill... But they shouldn't spend the available budget? they shouldnt spend just to spend. Well, you are right about that. When you spend just to spend, you end up with players like Carlos Beltran, Alfonso Soriano, Brian Roberts, Brain McCann, Chase Headley, Ichiro Suzuki, Kelly Johnson, and Chris Capuano |
|
|
|
Post by The Bag on Nov 14, 2014 13:33:00 GMT -5
they shouldnt spend just to spend. Well, you are right about that. When you spend just to spend, you end up with players like Carlos Beltran, Alfonso Soriano, Brian Roberts, Brain McCann, Chase Headley, Ichiro Suzuki, Kelly Johnson, and Chris Capuano getting panda for 5 years and huge money = "spending to spend" |
|
|
|
Post by NEW YORK on Nov 14, 2014 13:35:09 GMT -5
they shouldnt spend just to spend. Well, you are right about that. When you spend just to spend, you end up with players like Carlos Beltran, Alfonso Soriano, Brian Roberts, Brain McCann, Chase Headley, Ichiro Suzuki, Kelly Johnson, and Chris Capuano So basically a formula that led to 4 titles |
|
