Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 31, 2014 8:15:08 GMT -5
Jets have money. Patriots can find money. Seahawks have money. 49ers can find money. Panthers don't have money but need a receiver anyway. Saints don't really need him. They need a Darren Sproles replacement. |
|
|
|
Post by Zig on Mar 31, 2014 8:30:14 GMT -5
I'll say the Jets. They have money and Vick
|
|
|
|
Post by BHR on Mar 31, 2014 13:58:07 GMT -5
Rumor has it that RGIII and DeSean spent about 3 hours together this morning and then DJAX went to go meet with the Skins.
|
|
|
|
Post by BHR on Apr 1, 2014 7:04:47 GMT -5
Djax is a skin.
|
|
|
|
Post by BHR on Apr 1, 2014 7:10:01 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Zig on Apr 1, 2014 7:24:59 GMT -5
So he'll get to stick it to the team that dumped then trashed him twice a year. Should be fun!
|
|
|
|
Post by Royale McRoyals on Apr 1, 2014 9:20:03 GMT -5
Interesting team they've got in DC. Could be unstoppable, could be 2-12.
|
|
|
|
Post by Zig on Apr 1, 2014 13:14:01 GMT -5
I think I've been duped here.
I hate when that happens
|
|
|
|
Post by Zig on Apr 1, 2014 14:47:30 GMT -5
Adam Schefter
1 hr ·
Redskins and DeSean Jackson still haven’t discussed contract. Team to watch: SF. 49ers have "real but guarded” interest in DJax, per source
|
|
|
|
Post by BHR on Apr 1, 2014 15:03:06 GMT -5
WPVI in philly is going to look stupid if he signs elsewhere...
|
|
|
|
Post by BHR on Apr 2, 2014 5:12:04 GMT -5
I guess we can finally call this official
|
|
|
|
Post by Zig on Apr 2, 2014 6:37:37 GMT -5
Adam Schefter
32 mins ·
DeSean Jackson's 3-yr deal with the Redskins is worth $24 million, including $16 million guaranteed, per @darrenheitner
Adam Schefter
44 mins ·
No player in NFL history has switched teams within same division after he had at least 80 catches, 1,200+ receiving yds in previous season.
|
|
jets12
VIP Member
Posts: 54,917 
Likes: 9,986
|
Post by jets12 on Apr 2, 2014 13:17:01 GMT -5
I like it for the Redskins. D-Jax might be a low end [HASH]1 but this makes Garcon a damn good [HASH]2.
|
|
|
|
Post by b1ake on Apr 2, 2014 14:25:08 GMT -5
I like it for the Redskins. D-Jax might be a low end [HASH]1 but this makes Garcon a damn good [HASH]2. I think Garcon is a number 1... |
|
|
|
Post by Zig on Apr 2, 2014 14:44:50 GMT -5
I like it for the Redskins. D-Jax might be a low end [HASH]1 but this makes Garcon a damn good [HASH]2. I think Garcon is a number 1... Well they'll make a great tandem, that's for sure. but not great enough to get very far with that defense |
|
jets12
VIP Member
Posts: 54,917
Likes: 9,986
|
Post by jets12 on Apr 2, 2014 18:35:31 GMT -5
I am not saying they will be SB champs....but no one in that division is great, just good......this made the redskins very good.
Remember, at this time last year the Eagles were thought to have one of the worst D's in football..
|
|
|
|
Post by Zig on Apr 3, 2014 13:13:10 GMT -5
They worked out the Jersey [HASH] drama, finally
Adam Schefter
29 mins ·
With RGIII sticking with No. 10, new Redskins receiver DeSean Jackson now is leaning toward No. 11.
We can all move on with our lives now
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 3, 2014 13:51:10 GMT -5
Skins. They will continue to suck.
|
|
|
|
Post by Zig on Apr 3, 2014 21:11:08 GMT -5
Adam Schefter
31 mins ·
Fact of week: DeSean Jackson will count more against the Eagles' salary-cap this season ($6.25M) than he will the Redskins' ($4.25M).
double whammy...you're paying the guy to play against you twice a year...
this is why you take whatever you can get in a trade...to an AFC team
|
|
|
|
Post by BHR on Apr 4, 2014 8:39:11 GMT -5
|
|
