OXlodge
VIP Member
Posts: 47,693
Likes: 5,915
|
Post by OXlodge on Mar 24, 2017 13:57:59 GMT -5
Can we stop using the word "wiretapping"?? Yeah for real I remember the 70s Exactly. That's why it looks beyond ridiculous to even use a word like that. Even this schlep Nunes is like "Fuck me, now I have to explain this shit". "They did a very bad thing, they were spying on me", doesn't even sound right.
|
|
|
Post by Super Paul Mullin on Mar 24, 2017 13:59:45 GMT -5
What I love about this whole thing is the perpetual flip flopping by the Trumpeters:
During the election - "Who cares who's leaking the info! The emails are damning!"
After the election when there is info about contacts with Russians - "Who cares about what information was discussed! Who the hell is leaking this info!"
And now most recently - "Trump was right - he was surveilled! The person who leaked that to Nunes is a hero!"
|
|
OXlodge
VIP Member
Posts: 47,693
Likes: 5,915
|
Post by OXlodge on Mar 24, 2017 14:03:31 GMT -5
What I love about this whole thing is the perpetual flip flopping by the Trumpeters: During the election - "Who cares who's leaking the info! The emails are damning!" After the election when there is info about contacts with Russians - "Who cares about what information was discussed! Who the hell is leaking this info!" And now most recently - "Trump was right - he was surveilled! The person who leaked that to Nunes is a hero!" Now now...my perspective is that he was exchanging recipes with some of those Commies. Just like Hillary was planning Chelsea's wedding.
|
|
OXlodge
VIP Member
Posts: 47,693
Likes: 5,915
|
Post by OXlodge on Mar 24, 2017 14:04:22 GMT -5
Maybe nudes of Melania?
|
|
Chappion
VIP Member
Posts: 21,128
Likes: 2,166
|
Post by Chappion on Mar 24, 2017 14:40:58 GMT -5
Not a single vote was changed. Not a single voting machine was tampered with. I have not heard anyone quantify the effects of the DNC leaks in any way. Hillary just lost. She was terrible. But there HAS to be some kind of boogeyman involved. Lol. So they did it for no reason? That's what you're going with? They did what for no reason? Russians had given millions to the Clinton Foundation and were in cahoots with Podesta, too. They also openly wanted Obama to win in 2012.
|
|
Chappion
VIP Member
Posts: 21,128
Likes: 2,166
|
Post by Chappion on Mar 24, 2017 14:45:22 GMT -5
What I love about this whole thing is the perpetual flip flopping by the Trumpeters: During the election - "Who cares who's leaking the info! The emails are damning!" After the election when there is info about contacts with Russians - "Who cares about what information was discussed! Who the hell is leaking this info!" And now most recently - "Trump was right - he was surveilled! The person who leaked that to Nunes is a hero!" You don't seem to know the difference between the hacked DNC e-mails and our own government spying on the opposing party. The media was celebrating these leaks when they were damaging to Trump. But as soon as it became obvious that he was under surveillance, the media said the same leaks that they reported on didn't exist!
|
|
|
Post by Super Paul Mullin on Mar 24, 2017 15:23:26 GMT -5
What I love about this whole thing is the perpetual flip flopping by the Trumpeters: During the election - "Who cares who's leaking the info! The emails are damning!" After the election when there is info about contacts with Russians - "Who cares about what information was discussed! Who the hell is leaking this info!" And now most recently - "Trump was right - he was surveilled! The person who leaked that to Nunes is a hero!" You don't seem to know the difference between the hacked DNC e-mails and our own government spying on the opposing party. The media was celebrating these leaks when they were damaging to Trump. But as soon as it became obvious that he was under surveillance, the media said the same leaks that they reported on didn't exist! What I know is that when there are "leaks" about Trump's campaign colluding with the Russkies, they're "treasonous leakers." When there are leaks going to Nunes that support Trump's claim he was surveilled, they're "Patriot whistleblowers".
|
|
lemiwinks
VIP Member
Posts: 44,029
Likes: 4,976
|
Post by lemiwinks on Mar 24, 2017 15:28:42 GMT -5
You don't seem to know the difference between the hacked DNC e-mails and our own government spying on the opposing party. The media was celebrating these leaks when they were damaging to Trump. But as soon as it became obvious that he was under surveillance, the media said the same leaks that they reported on didn't exist! What I know is that when there are "leaks" about Trump's campaign colluding with the Russkies, they're "treasonous leakers." When there are leaks going to Nunes that support Trump's claim he was surveilled, they're "Patriot whistleblowers". none of this shit means anything......not bringing the AHCA for a vote is actually news that matters.....his immigration policy matters....his supreme court nomination matters....
was he surveiled? did Russians hack email? whatever the fuck he tweets......that's just a bunch of noise.
|
|
Chappion
VIP Member
Posts: 21,128
Likes: 2,166
|
Post by Chappion on Mar 24, 2017 15:35:48 GMT -5
You don't seem to know the difference between the hacked DNC e-mails and our own government spying on the opposing party. The media was celebrating these leaks when they were damaging to Trump. But as soon as it became obvious that he was under surveillance, the media said the same leaks that they reported on didn't exist! What I know is that when there are "leaks" about Trump's campaign colluding with the Russkies, they're "treasonous leakers." When there are leaks going to Nunes that support Trump's claim he was surveilled, they're "Patriot whistleblowers". Don't act like it doesn't work both ways. When the leaks hurt the DNC, the establishment was horrified. When the leaks hurt Trump, they were ecstatic. Same thing...just the other side of the coin.
|
|
Mr mastodon farm
SportsChatter Hall of Famer
back to back World Series Poster
Posts: 107,961
Likes: 13,004
|
Post by Mr mastodon farm on Mar 24, 2017 16:05:38 GMT -5
Trump could offer every American $1M and the politicians would say it was a bad idea
|
|