Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 16, 2014 16:52:13 GMT -5
Really? How are they now or when have they been built for longer than 3/4 years? They have sustained success but that is not the same thing when you have an 80% player turnover from one four year stretch to the next. To say they were built for 12 straight years of success when they only have one player left from 2002 would be asinine. No it wouldn't. It would be fair. Brady, belichick and the system. Wonder why we always say brady foea what he does with hit garbage at wr most of the time? You say roster turnovers every 3-4 years? H s ppens every year here...yet, like i said going into the year...12-4 or 13-3. Having a re-build philosophy is not the same thing as being built for success. It's a ridiculous statement from someone desperate to salvage a lost argument.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 16, 2014 16:54:17 GMT -5
Theyre the only team to make that claim, so logically...so on and o on. If you're happy with AFC east titles, celebrate I guess Again Read the words Only team to have a run of divisional dominance like that. Set up nearly every year for a sb run with a hof qb and coach. Thats alllllll im saying...thus, theyre built every year to win. Some years they had no business in a title game or superbowl, but somehow they get there. Allllll im saying. What other team can make that claim? |
|
|
|
Post by Zig on Nov 16, 2014 16:54:54 GMT -5
Really? How are they now or when have they been built for longer than 3/4 years? They have sustained success but that is not the same thing when you have an 80% player turnover from one four year stretch to the next. To say they were built for 12 straight years of success when they only have one player left from 2002 would be asinine. No it wouldn't. It would be fair. Brady, belichick and the system. Wonder why we always say brady does what he does with hot garbage at wr most of the time? You say roster turnovers every 3-4 years? Happens every year here...yet, like i said going into the year...12-4 or 13-3. Really have to say they have under achieved...No doubt Brady and Bill are near the top of the all time list. That's the hard part...They couldnt quite fill in the right pieces to get it done anymore once all the Parcel type guys were gone |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 16, 2014 16:59:14 GMT -5
No it wouldn't. It would be fair. Brady, belichick and the system. Wonder why we always say brady does what he does with hot garbage at wr most of the time? You say roster turnovers every 3-4 years? Happens every year here...yet, like i said going into the year...12-4 or 13-3. Really have to say they have under achieved...No doubt Brady and Bill are near the top of the all time list. That's the hard part...They couldnt quite fill in the right pieces to get it done anymore once all the Parcel type guys were gone No doubt they've under achieved. No titles in 10 years? But theyre built to win their division every year. That means a home playoff game. That means a better shot of advancing. Built to win. |
|
|
|
Post by Super Paul Mullin on Nov 16, 2014 16:59:52 GMT -5
Time to throw throw throw Sanchez. I'm already regretting starting him.
|
|
|
|
Post by Just Another Shem on Nov 16, 2014 17:00:52 GMT -5
No it wouldn't. It would be fair. Brady, belichick and the system. Wonder why we always say brady foea what he does with hit garbage at wr most of the time? You say roster turnovers every 3-4 years? H s ppens every year here...yet, like i said going into the year...12-4 or 13-3. Having a re-build philosophy is not the same thing as being built for success. It's a ridiculous statement from someone desperate to salvage a lost argument.
Actually, the model is to be in contention every year. Here is the Patriots model... - Don't over-extend for any one player at the expense of the future
- Don't get emotional, cut bait with guys too soon rather than too late
- Don't overpay for positions where there are much cheaper, quality alternatives
- Build a 53 man, end to end roster. Not a top heavy team with no depth
- Brady
- Belichick
It's the system they've employed for 15 years. And they're on their way to their 13th division title in 15 years. It's a system that considers it a "down year" when you lose in the conference championship game. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 16, 2014 17:01:27 GMT -5
Having a re-build philosophy is not the same thing as being built for success. It's a ridiculous statement from someone desperate to salvage a lost argument.
Actually, the model is to be in contention every year. Here is the Patriots model... - Don't over-extend for any one player at the expense of the future
- Don't get emotional, cut bait with guys too soon rather than too late
- Don't overpay for positions where there are much cheaper, quality alternatives
- Build a 53 man, end to end roster. Not a top heavy team with no depth
- Brady
- Belichick
It's the system they've employed for 15 years. And they're on their way to their 13th division title in 15 years. It's a system that considers it a "down year" when you lose in the conference championship game. This Exactly this |
|
|
|
Post by mrpickles on Nov 16, 2014 17:01:47 GMT -5
Pickles is always wrong
17-0 now
|
|
|
|
Post by Super Paul Mullin on Nov 16, 2014 17:02:28 GMT -5
Time to throw throw throw Sanchez. I'm already regretting starting him. Hater. Literally every time I start Wilson, it's Lynch Lynch Lynch. So I say fuck it, and start Sanchez, and Wilson has a good game. My powers of jinx are formidable. |
|
|
|
Post by Zig on Nov 16, 2014 17:03:55 GMT -5
Really have to say they have under achieved...No doubt Brady and Bill are near the top of the all time list. That's the hard part...They couldnt quite fill in the right pieces to get it done anymore once all the Parcel type guys were gone No doubt they've under achieved. No titles in 10 years? But theyre built to win their division every year. That means a home playoff game. That means a better shot of advancing. Built to win. yeah just saying it sucks...They really lost a lot good football people at the top and just never replaced them with anyone good. It's all Bill now... |
|
|
|
Post by mrpickles on Nov 16, 2014 17:04:44 GMT -5
Having a re-build philosophy is not the same thing as being built for success. It's a ridiculous statement from someone desperate to salvage a lost argument.
Actually, the model is to be in contention every year. Here is the Patriots model... - Don't over-extend for any one player at the expense of the future
- Don't get emotional, cut bait with guys too soon rather than too late
- Don't overpay for positions where there are much cheaper, quality alternatives
- Build a 53 man, end to end roster. Not a top heavy team with no depth
- Brady
- Belichick
It's the system they've employed for 15 years. And they're on their way to their 13th division title in 15 years. It's a system that considers it a "down year" when you lose in the conference championship game. Yea thats mosly true. But youre forgetting the most important part Have one of the 5 best QBs ever under center the entire time. In a time when the NFL makes it easier on QBs every year. Theyve done things right no doubt. But all that stuff means shit when you have a Brady or a Peyton. |
|
|
|
Post by mrpickles on Nov 16, 2014 17:05:53 GMT -5
Sanchez does throw one pretty ball
|
|
|
|
Post by MoonDriven on Nov 16, 2014 17:07:12 GMT -5
Really liking Matthews  |
|
|
|
Post by Zig on Nov 16, 2014 17:08:32 GMT -5
Actually, the model is to be in contention every year. Here is the Patriots model... - Don't over-extend for any one player at the expense of the future
- Don't get emotional, cut bait with guys too soon rather than too late
- Don't overpay for positions where there are much cheaper, quality alternatives
- Build a 53 man, end to end roster. Not a top heavy team with no depth
- Brady
- Belichick
It's the system they've employed for 15 years. And they're on their way to their 13th division title in 15 years. It's a system that considers it a "down year" when you lose in the conference championship game. Yea thats mosly true. But youre forgetting the most important part Have one of the 5 best QBs ever under center the entire time. In a time when the NFL makes it easier on QBs every year. Theyve done things right no doubt. But all that stuff means shit when you have a Brady or a Peyton. How can ya not love this guy? |
|
|
|
Post by Zig on Nov 16, 2014 17:10:19 GMT -5
Sanchez is making the Packers D look good
|
|
|
|
Post by Just Another Shem on Nov 16, 2014 17:11:12 GMT -5
McCoy gets the Eagles to the ten yard line.
Kelly pulls him out of the game and he never sees another touch on the drive.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 16, 2014 17:12:20 GMT -5
Literally every time I start Wilson, it's Lynch Lynch Lynch. So I say fuck it, and start Sanchez, and Wilson has a good game. My powers of jinx are formidable. I follow trends and am always looking to upgrade my bench/emergency QB. I picked up McCown prior to week 10 and he's put up 45 points in the last two games.
Wilson is going against Arizona or San Francisco in four of the next five weeks. It's a good time to drop him.
|
|
|
|
Post by mrpickles on Nov 16, 2014 17:13:10 GMT -5
Sanchez is making the Packers D look good The pack are one of the few teams that if you get down big early youre done. That D is pretty much built soley for the team to get up early and then just blitz all day |
|
|
|
Post by MoonDriven on Nov 16, 2014 17:17:22 GMT -5
Oh boy LOL
At least Nelson is on my FD team
|
|
|
|
Post by mrpickles on Nov 16, 2014 17:17:36 GMT -5
Fuckin ARod is incredible.
Like truly not one QB in the league is even close to him.
|
|
|
|
Post by BGKO on Nov 16, 2014 17:20:12 GMT -5
Eagles D getting xxxposed
|
|
|
|
Post by MoonDriven on Nov 16, 2014 17:21:55 GMT -5
Eagles D getting xxxposed Exposed? Their secondary is awful LOL |
|
|
|
Post by BGKO on Nov 16, 2014 17:23:29 GMT -5
Yes....another Td and I'll add another x.
|
|
|
|
Post by BGKO on Nov 16, 2014 17:25:20 GMT -5
Totally agree w u Pickles on GB D too...
|
|
|
|
Post by Zig on Nov 16, 2014 17:25:30 GMT -5
Sanchez is making the Packers D look good The pack are one of the few teams that if you get down big early youre done. That D is pretty much built soley for the team to get up early and then just blitz all day I predicted this curb stomping MD threatened me with his abs |
|
|
|
Post by Zig on Nov 16, 2014 17:26:14 GMT -5
c'mon Matthews, gotta catch that
|
|
|
|
Post by MoonDriven on Nov 16, 2014 17:27:30 GMT -5
This is ugly
Offense has moved the ball a bit, but their defense has shown no signs of slowing down Rodgers
|
|
Mr mastodon farm
SportsChatter Hall of Famer
back to back World Series Poster
Posts: 107,966 
Likes: 13,004
|
Post by Mr mastodon farm on Nov 16, 2014 17:27:55 GMT -5
sure wish sproles would get the fucking ball
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 16, 2014 17:29:43 GMT -5
Fuckin ARod is incredible. Like truly not one QB in the league is even close to him. Yep, greatest QB in the NFL this year was afraid to throw in the direction of Richard Sherman. |
|
Mr mastodon farm
SportsChatter Hall of Famer
back to back World Series Poster
Posts: 107,966
Likes: 13,004
|
Post by Mr mastodon farm on Nov 16, 2014 17:30:10 GMT -5
rivers screaming at his teammates
"what an asshole. his teammates hate him"
|
|
